Nuclear waste dumping on indigenous land is the focus of the powerful new documentary To Use a Mountain, which exposes the environmental violence faced by communities fighting to protect their sacred territories. Directed by Casey Carter, the film brings to light the ongoing struggle against the Hanford nuclear reservation in Washington state, where radioactive contamination has devastated local ecosystems and indigenous livelihoods.
The Hidden Cost of Nuclear Energy
Nuclear energy has long been touted as a clean and limitless power source, but the reality is far darker. The documentary reveals how the industry's promises of safety and prosperity mask the toxic legacy of radioactive waste. From Chornobyl to Fukushima, the risks are undeniable, yet the burden of nuclear waste disposal often falls on marginalized communities, including indigenous peoples.
In To Use a Mountain, Carter interviews farmers and tribal members who have lived with the consequences of nuclear contamination for decades. Their stories highlight the systemic injustice that allows powerful interests to prioritize profit over people and the planet.
Indigenous Land as a Nuclear Dumping Ground
The Hanford site, once the heart of the Manhattan Project, is now one of the most contaminated places in the United States. The film shows how the U.S. government and nuclear industry have historically targeted indigenous land for waste storage, exploiting legal loopholes and ignoring tribal sovereignty.
As one farmer in the documentary jokes, "Nuclear power is the only faith-based energy because everyone always asks, 'Do you believe in it?'" This line underscores the blind trust placed in nuclear technology, despite overwhelming evidence of its dangers.

Environmental Violence and Resistance
The documentary doesn't just expose the problem—it celebrates the resilience of those fighting back. Indigenous activists and local communities are organizing to demand accountability and a just transition to renewable energy. Their resistance is a testament to the power of grassroots movements in the face of corporate and governmental negligence.
Through intimate interviews and striking visuals, To Use a Mountain challenges viewers to reconsider the true cost of nuclear energy and to stand in solidarity with those on the frontlines of environmental justice.
Key Takeaways from To Use a Mountain
- Nuclear waste disposal disproportionately impacts indigenous and marginalized communities.
- The Hanford site exemplifies the long-term dangers of radioactive contamination.
- Grassroots resistance is crucial in the fight for environmental justice.
- Renewable energy offers a safer, more equitable alternative to nuclear power.
Data Table: Nuclear Incidents and Their Impacts
| Incident | Location | Year | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chornobyl | Ukraine | 1986 | Widespread radioactive contamination, displacement |
| Three Mile Island | USA | 1979 | Partial meltdown, no immediate deaths but long-term health concerns |
| Fukushima | Japan | 2011 | Nuclear meltdown, massive evacuation, ocean contamination |
| Hanford | USA | 1943-present | Ongoing radioactive waste, groundwater contamination |
Why This Documentary Matters
In an era of climate crisis, the debate over nuclear energy is more relevant than ever. To Use a Mountain serves as a crucial reminder that true sustainability must include environmental justice. By amplifying the voices of those who have been silenced, the film urges us to rethink our energy choices and prioritize the health of both people and the planet.
As Casey Carter reflects, the fight to save indigenous land from nuclear dumping is not just about one community—it's about the future of our shared environment. The documentary is a call to action for viewers to support indigenous rights and demand a cleaner, safer energy future.