The NSW Greens MP Sue Higginson has made an impassioned plea to her federal colleagues not to support a National party motion that would block a koala park carbon credit deal. The dispute centers on a federal regulation allowing state governments to earn carbon credits for protecting native forests on public land, a move the Nationals want to overturn on behalf of the forestry industry.
Higginson, a former lawyer and forest campaigner, is the first Greens member to speak publicly about the rift that has split the party and environmentalists. The Senate vote is scheduled next week, and the federal Greens will decide on Tuesday whether to back the motion, which would effectively kill the regulation.
The Carbon Credit Method and Koala Park Plan
The proposed koala national park in NSW would generate millions of dollars in carbon credits under the federal method. However, the Nationals argue that the regulation undermines the forestry sector, prompting their disallowance motion. The Greens face a dilemma: supporting the motion could be seen as opposing nature protection, while rejecting it may alienate some environmental groups.
Conservationists have lobbied intensively, including full-page newspaper ads and email campaigns, urging the method's removal. The Australia Institute, a think tank, has also called for the regulation to be killed, citing concerns about its environmental integrity.
The Political Fallout and Party Dynamics
The federal Greens' internal discussions reflect broader tensions between pragmatic politics and environmental advocacy. Higginson's plea highlights the risk of being accused of siding with pro-logging interests if they back the Nationals' motion. Yet, some argue that the carbon credit method may not effectively protect forests, as it could lead to perverse incentives.
The decision could have significant implications for the party's credibility and its relationship with environmental groups. The outcome of the Senate vote will also test the Greens' influence in a hung parliament.
| Option | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Back Nationals' motion | May address carbon credit flaws; aligns with some green groups | Seen as supporting logging; risks public backlash |
| Reject motion | Protects koala park plan; maintains pro-environment stance | May perpetuate flawed carbon credit system |
Key Takeaways
- The Greens are divided over a motion to block a koala park carbon credit deal.
- The Senate vote will determine the fate of the regulation.
- Higginson urges colleagues to consider the political and environmental consequences.
FAQ
What is the carbon credit method?
It's a federal regulation allowing state governments to earn carbon credits for protecting native forests on public land, which can be sold to polluters.
Why does the Nationals want to block it?
They argue it harms the forestry industry by reducing logging opportunities and creating unfair competition.
What is the Greens' dilemma?
They must balance supporting the koala park plan with concerns about the carbon credit method's flaws, while avoiding accusations of siding with logging interests.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of inch subwoofer, hoverboard kids, compressor pedal, bra sagging breasts, and wireless guitar system. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of toothbrush braces, dtf printer, metal detectors gold, tennis shoes plantar fasciitis, and fermentation kit beginners. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.