The Libor rigging scandal has taken a dramatic turn as five former Barclays traders had their convictions quashed by the Court of Appeal in London. This decision marks a significant moment in the long-running battle to clear the names of those involved in manipulating interest rates.
The Traders and Their Convictions
The five traders—Jay Vijay Merchant, Jonathan Mathew, Philippe Moryoussef, Alex Pabon, and Colin Bermingham—were jailed between 2016 and 2019 for manipulating the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (Euribor) and the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor). These rates affected the value of pensions, mortgages, and savings for ordinary people, as well as trillions of pounds in financial products globally.
Their acquittals came just over a year after the UK Supreme Court overturned a decade-old ruling against Tom Hayes, a former UBS and Citigroup trader who was the first banker jailed for Libor-rigging in 2015. Carlo Palombo, another former Barclays trader, also had his conviction quashed in July 2025.
Why Were the Convictions Quashed?
The Supreme Court found faults in the original trials, leading to the overturning of Hayes and Palombo's convictions. This set a precedent that paved the way for the five Barclays traders to apply to clear their names. The Court of Appeal's decision on Wednesday reflects a broader reassessment of the evidence and legal standards used in these cases.
Key Takeaways
- The convictions of five former Barclays traders were quashed by the Court of Appeal.
- The decision follows the Supreme Court's overturning of Tom Hayes' conviction in 2025.
- Libor and Euribor manipulation affected global financial markets and ordinary consumers.
- The rulings raise questions about the fairness of previous prosecutions.
Impact on the Banking Industry
The Libor rigging scandal shook the financial world, leading to billions in fines and a loss of trust in major banks. The quashing of these convictions may prompt a review of how financial crimes are prosecuted and could lead to compensation claims or further legal challenges.

| Traders | Bank | Conviction Year | Sentence | Conviction Quashed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jay Vijay Merchant | Barclays | 2016 | Prison | 2026 |
| Jonathan Mathew | Barclays | 2016 | Prison | 2026 |
| Philippe Moryoussef | Barclays | 2016 | Prison | 2026 |
| Alex Pabon | Barclays | 2016 | Prison | 2026 |
| Colin Bermingham | Barclays | 2019 | Prison | 2026 |
| Tom Hayes | UBS/Citigroup | 2015 | Prison | 2025 |
| Carlo Palombo | Barclays | 2019 | Prison | 2025 |
What's Next for Financial Regulation?
The quashed convictions highlight the complexities of prosecuting financial crimes and the importance of fair trials. Regulators may need to reassess their approach to investigating and prosecuting rate-rigging cases. Meanwhile, the traders can now move forward with their lives, though the stigma of the allegations may linger.
FAQ
What was the Libor rigging scandal?
The Libor rigging scandal involved bankers manipulating the London Interbank Offered Rate (Libor) and similar rates to benefit their trading positions, affecting global financial markets.
Why were the Barclays traders' convictions quashed?
The Court of Appeal quashed the convictions after the Supreme Court found faults in the original trials, following the overturning of Tom Hayes' conviction.
How does this affect the banking industry?
It may lead to a review of prosecution methods and could prompt compensation claims, further impacting trust in financial institutions.