Palestine Action Barclays Five Avoid Terror Sentencing 2026

Palestine Action activists known as the 'Barclays five' will not be sentenced as terrorists, a judge has ruled, marking a significant decision in UK protest law. The five individuals, who vandalized a Barclays branch in Burnley, were found guilty of causing over £200,000 in damage but avoided the controversial terrorist designation.

Background of the Barclays Five Case

The group—Brendon O’Hagan, 28; Amanda Kelly, 31; Hmeera Atiqnisar, 31; Mohammed Malik, 28; and Alma Yaniv, 70—broke windows and threw red paint at a Barclays Bank branch in Lancashire in August 2024. Their protest targeted Barclays because the bank held shares in Israeli weapons firm Elbit Systems. The activists claimed they did not realize their case could be considered terrorism until after the guilty verdict.

Judge's Ruling on Terror Connection

Judge Philip Parry had initially indicated he would consider a 'terrorist connection' to the offending, based on new information during the trial. However, the final ruling rejected this designation, meaning the five will face standard criminal sentencing rather than enhanced terrorism penalties. This decision has implications for how protest actions are classified under UK counter-terrorism laws.

Key Details and Timeline

Barclays had previously stated it held Elbit shares only for client-driven transactions, not as an investor. In October 2024, reports confirmed Barclays sold all its Elbit shares. The jury that convicted the activists was unaware that terrorism consideration was even possible, raising questions about procedural transparency.

Implications for Protest Law

This case highlights the tension between lawful protest and terrorism legislation. The ruling sets a precedent that property damage in political protests may not automatically trigger terrorism sentencing, even when targeting companies with defense ties. Legal experts note that the distinction hinges on intent and the definition of 'terrorism' under the Terrorism Act 2000.

Reactions and Next Steps

The activists have not yet been sentenced, with the hearing scheduled for a later date. Supporters argue the terrorism label was an overreach, while critics maintain that targeting defense suppliers crosses a line. The case continues to draw attention to Barclays' historical investments and the ethics of corporate engagement with arms manufacturers.

Key Takeaways

• The 'Barclays five' will not be sentenced as terrorists, avoiding enhanced penalties.
• Judge Philip Parry ruled against a terrorist connection despite initial consideration.
• Barclays sold all Elbit shares in October 2024, prior to the ruling.
• The case raises questions about jury awareness and terrorism law application.
• Sentencing for criminal damage will proceed under standard guidelines.

FAQ

Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of pc sims, mics gaming pc, headsets ps4, pc iracing, and ddr5 ram laptop. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of pc world warcraft, computer minecraft, dac amp, surround headset, and mmo keyboard. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.