WA Oil Refinery Dinosaur Technology, Experts Warn 2026

The mooted WA oil refinery is being called dinosaur technology by climate experts, who argue it would be a costly investment in fossil fuels during a critical clean energy transition. With the Albanese government committing $4 million to a feasibility study, the debate highlights the tension between fuel security and climate commitments.

Why Experts Call the WA Oil Refinery Dinosaur Technology

Leading climate policy experts, including Greg Bourne from the Climate Council and Professor Frank Jotzo from the Australian National University, have voiced strong opposition to the proposed refinery in the Pilbara. They argue that investing in new fossil fuel infrastructure now would lock in decades of emissions and contradict Australia's renewable energy goals.

According to Bourne, a former BP executive, any new refinery is unlikely to be economically viable over the next 20-30 years as global demand for oil declines. Jotzo, speaking at the Clean Energy Summit, warned that the project would send a big signal against the clean energy transition and would likely require massive public subsidies to compete with mega refineries in Singapore and South Asia.

The Economic Case Against the Oil Refinery

The experts stress that the feasibility study will likely reveal the project is uneconomic without government support. The global refining industry is consolidating, and Australia's domestic market is too small to support a new large-scale refinery. Furthermore, the cost of building and operating a refinery in the remote Pilbara region would be significantly higher than in established refining hubs.

Fuel Security vs. Climate Action

Proponents argue that a domestic refinery would enhance fuel security by reducing reliance on imports. However, experts counter that fuel security can be achieved through strategic reserves, diversification of import sources, and investment in green hydrogen and electric vehicles. The future of liquid fuels is uncertain, and a new refinery would be a gamble on outdated technology.

Better Investments for a Clean Energy Future

Instead of subsidizing a dinosaur technology, the government should redirect funds to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy, battery storage, and energy efficiency measures. This would create jobs, reduce emissions, and position Australia as a leader in the global energy transition.

• Renewable energy projects (solar, wind) are cost-competitive and scalable.
• Green hydrogen can replace fossil fuels in heavy transport and industry.
• Electric vehicle infrastructure reduces demand for petrol and diesel.
• Energy efficiency lowers overall consumption and costs.

FAQ

In conclusion, the WA oil refinery proposal represents a backward step in Australia's clean energy transition. Experts agree that public money should be channeled into future-proof technologies that will deliver economic and environmental benefits for decades to come.