Women's football continues to be used as a pawn in Gianni Infantino's FIFA tenure, as the recent clash over private investment in the World Cup demonstrates. The sport, which has seen remarkable growth and revenue gains, now faces political turbulence that threatens its momentum. This analysis explores the implications of the failed proposal and what it means for the future of the women's game.
The FIFA Proposal and Its Fallout
FIFA's plan to sell stakes in the World Cup to private investors was met with fierce opposition from UEFA and national associations. The proposal, detailed in a 25-page sales deck, barely mentioned women's football, yet women's tournaments would have been the first to suffer if a boycott had materialized.
UEFA's bold declaration that European teams would not participate in any FIFA competition while the proposal remained alive effectively killed the plan. The collapse was a victory for governance, but it exposed the vulnerability of women's football in the political chess game.
The Impact on Women's Tournaments
With the Under-20 Women's World Cup in Poland, the Under-17 tournament, and the senior World Cup in Brazil next summer, the women's game was on the frontline. A boycott would have been catastrophic, setting back progress far more than four years.
The 2023 Women's World Cup was the first to break even, generating over $570 million in revenue. FIFA targets $1 billion for the 2027 edition, but such ambitions are at risk when the sport is used as leverage.

Why Women's Football Is Especially Vulnerable
Women's football relies heavily on international competitions for growth, sponsorship, and visibility. Unlike the men's game, which has lucrative domestic leagues, the women's game depends on World Cups to attract investment and media attention. This dependency makes it an easy target in political disputes.
| Tournament | Revenue | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Women's World Cup | $570 million | Break-even |
| 2027 Women's World Cup (target) | $1 billion | Planned |
Key Takeaways
- Women's football is often used as a bargaining chip in FIFA's internal politics.
- The failed investment proposal could have derailed the 2027 World Cup.
- UEFA's stance was necessary but highlighted the fragility of women's tournaments.
- Revenue growth in women's football is promising but not yet secure.
What This Means for the Future
FIFA must prioritize the integrity of its competitions, especially women's events, over private interests. The fallout sends a message that governance reforms are needed to protect the sport from such power plays.
For fans and stakeholders, this episode underscores the need for transparency and accountability in football's governing bodies. The women's game deserves better than to be collateral damage in political battles.
FAQ
Why was women's football at risk?
Women's tournaments were scheduled during the proposed boycott period, making them the first to be affected if UEFA's threat had been executed.
What was the outcome of the FIFA proposal?
The proposal was abandoned due to widespread opposition from UEFA and national associations, but not before causing significant controversy.
How much revenue does women's football generate?
The 2023 Women's World Cup generated over $570 million, and FIFA targets $1 billion for the 2027 edition.