Andy Burnham wants to remake Britain from the regions up, but can his devolution plan work? The Mayor of Greater Manchester has proposed giving more power and money to England's regions than ever before, aiming to transform local governance and renew faith in democracy.
What Is Andy Burnham's Devolution Plan?
At its core, Burnham's plan seeks to transfer significant authority and funding from Westminster to regional mayors and local councils. This includes control over budgets for transport, housing, skills, and economic development. The goal is to create a more balanced economy and bring decision-making closer to the people.
Devolution isn't a new concept, but Burnham's vision is notably ambitious. He argues that decades of centralization have left regions powerless and disillusioned. By empowering local leaders, he believes we can rebuild trust in politics and deliver more effective services.
Key Elements of the Proposal
- Fiscal autonomy: Regions would retain a larger share of tax revenue to fund local priorities.
- Enhanced mayoral powers: Mayors would gain greater control over planning, infrastructure, and public services.
- Regional investment funds: Dedicated pots of money to stimulate growth in underperforming areas.
- Democratic accountability: New mechanisms to ensure transparency and citizen involvement.
The Promise and Perils of Regional Empowerment
Proponents argue that devolution can unleash regional potential, leading to tailored solutions that address local needs. For example, Greater Manchester's integrated transport system, overseen by Burnham, has been praised for improving connectivity. Similarly, regional control over skills training could better match local labor market demands.
However, the context is challenging. Local media has been gutted, reducing scrutiny of local authorities. Mechanisms for overseeing council finances have weakened, and many councils have made risky investments, leading to bankruptcies like Woking and Thurrock. These issues erode the state's legitimacy and could undermine devolution's potential.

Comparing Centralized vs. Devolved Governance
| Aspect | Centralized Governance | Devolved Governance |
|---|---|---|
| Decision-Making Speed | Slow, bureaucratic | Faster, locally responsive |
| Accountability | Distant, opaque | Closer, but requires robust scrutiny |
| Policy Fit | One-size-fits-all | Tailored to local needs |
| Risk of Corruption | Concentrated at national level | Diffused, but local oversight crucial |
Can Devolution Restore Trust in Democracy?
Burnham hopes that devolution will renew people's faith in democracy by giving them a greater say in decisions that affect their lives. When people see tangible improvements in their communities, they may feel more engaged and less cynical. But for this to happen, devolution must be accompanied by strong safeguards against mismanagement and corruption.
Without proper scrutiny, devolution could exacerbate existing problems. If regional leaders are given vast powers without adequate checks, there's a risk of abuse and financial mismanagement. The decline of local media makes it harder for citizens to hold leaders accountable, creating an information vacuum that undermines democratic participation.
Challenges Facing Burnham's Plan
- Financial fragility: Many councils are already struggling financially; additional responsibilities without sufficient funding could push them over the edge.
- Lack of scrutiny: The hollowing out of local journalism means fewer watchdogs to expose waste and incompetence.
- Political resistance: Westminster may be reluctant to cede power and resources to the regions.
- Public skepticism: Years of broken promises have left many voters distrustful of any political initiative.
Lessons from Other Countries
Devolution is not unique to the UK. Countries like Germany, Canada, and Spain have varying degrees of regional autonomy. Germany's federal system, for instance, gives states significant control over education and policing, with strong constitutional safeguards. Canada's provinces have broad powers, including taxation. These models show that devolution can work, but they also highlight the importance of clear frameworks and robust oversight.
The UK's approach would need to adapt these lessons to its own context. A piecemeal approach could lead to inconsistencies and confusion. A coherent strategy, with clear lines of accountability and sustainable funding, is essential.

FAQ
What is Andy Burnham's devolution plan?
Andy Burnham's devolution plan aims to transfer more power and money from central government to England's regions. It includes giving regional mayors greater control over budgets, transport, housing, and skills, with the goal of boosting local economies and renewing trust in democracy.
Can devolution work in the UK?
Devolution can work if implemented with strong accountability, sustainable funding, and robust scrutiny. However, challenges such as local media decline, council bankruptcies, and political resistance pose significant risks that must be addressed.
What are the main risks of Burnham's plan?
The main risks include financial mismanagement by councils, lack of media scrutiny, potential corruption, and public skepticism. Without proper safeguards, devolution could deepen existing inequalities and erode trust further.