As the 25th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks approaches, experts are sounding the alarm over what they call “institutional neglect” in US counter-terrorism efforts. The warning comes amid growing challenges in countering international terrorism as resources are diverted to other threats, experienced security officials leave, and complacency spreads.
The Erosion of US Counter-Terrorism Architecture
Since the devastating attacks on New York and Washington that killed about 3,000 people, the US built a robust counter-terrorism architecture. However, experts now warn that this infrastructure is eroding. Bruce Hoffman, a terrorism expert at Georgetown University, testified before the US House permanent select committee on intelligence that the architecture is deteriorating “through budget cuts, personnel losses, and the diminution of terrorism” as a priority.
Hoffman recalled the chaos of 9/11 and his belief that the nation would never lower its guard again. Yet, 25 years later, complacency has set in. The episodic nature of terrorism means that when it does strike, it is highly consequential, but the lack of recent large-scale attacks has led to a false sense of security.
Resource Diversion and Politicization
Critics point to the diversion of resources away from counter-terrorism to other areas, such as drug cartels and great power competition. Some blame former President Donald Trump for politicizing counter-terrorism efforts, making ill-considered appointments to senior intelligence posts, and shifting focus. This politicization has undermined the effectiveness of counter-terrorism strategies.
The departure of experienced security officials has also taken a toll. As seasoned experts leave, institutional knowledge is lost, and the ability to respond to emerging threats is weakened. The combination of resource diversion and personnel losses creates a perfect storm for potential security gaps.

Key Takeaways
- Institutional neglect is eroding US counter-terrorism capabilities.
- Resource diversion to other threats reduces focus on terrorism.
- Politicization and loss of experienced officials weaken efforts.
- Complacency poses a significant risk as threats evolve.
Comparing Counter-Terrorism Then and Now
| Aspect | Post-9/11 Era | Current Era (2026) |
|---|---|---|
| Funding | Increased dramatically | Budget cuts and reallocation |
| Personnel | Experienced officials retained | Loss of experienced officials |
| Focus | Single-minded focus on terrorism | Diversion to other threats |
| Politicization | Bipartisan support | Politicized appointments |
The Path Forward
To address these challenges, experts recommend reversing budget cuts, retaining experienced personnel, and depoliticizing counter-terrorism efforts. A renewed focus on the evolving threat landscape is essential. The US must adapt to new forms of terrorism, including lone-wolf attacks and cyber-terrorism, while maintaining vigilance.
Without decisive action, the nation risks repeating the mistakes that led to 9/11. The 25th anniversary serves as a stark reminder that counter-terrorism requires sustained attention and investment.
FAQ
What is meant by 'institutional neglect' in US counter-terrorism?
Institutional neglect refers to the erosion of counter-terrorism capabilities due to budget cuts, loss of experienced personnel, and reduced focus on terrorism as a priority.
How has resource diversion affected counter-terrorism?
Resources have been shifted to other threats like drug cartels and great power competition, leaving fewer resources for counter-terrorism efforts.
What can be done to improve US counter-terrorism?
Experts recommend reversing budget cuts, retaining experienced personnel, depoliticizing efforts, and maintaining a focus on evolving threats.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of propane shower, fifth wheel camper tires, caulk camper, rug, and utensils. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of strains sinus pressure, lightweight tree stand, solar generator, spotlight long distance, and rechargeable spotlight. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.