Trump's attacks on mail-in voting have created significant uncertainty for the upcoming midterms, especially for the millions of Americans who rely on absentee ballots. Almost a third of the country votes by mail, and a March executive order from Donald Trump aimed to restrict mail-in ballots, sparking legal battles and logistical concerns. By Monday night, the Supreme Court restored a measure of order by rebuking the president and rejecting his plan – but Trump's frothing response portends more danger for the rapidly approaching midterms.
Background on Trump's Executive Order
Trump's March order forbade the US Postal Service from delivering mailed ballots to anyone the administration deemed ineligible. The Department of Homeland Security, working with the Social Security Administration, would have devised that list of supposedly ineligible, noncitizen voters. On its face, the move appeared plainly illegal. One expert told the Guardian's Sam Levine, "This is a wholly unconstitutional EO," because ultimately the federal government cannot set election rules; only states can.
The plan was full of logistical problems, too. A whistleblower told Congress earlier this month that the Postal Service simply didn't have the ability to implement the system safely, and that the whole plan was "perilously rushed and potentially unlawful", according to Richard Blumenthal, the senator who handled the whistleblower complaint. State election officials also complained they would be unable to implement such a system in time for the midterms.
Supreme Court Ruling and Trump's Response
The Supreme Court's rejection of Trump's plan was a significant rebuke, but Trump's response has raised concerns about further attacks on mail-in voting. The ruling restored some certainty, but experts warn that the damage to voter confidence may already be done. With the midterms approaching, the battle over mail-in voting is far from over.
Impact on Midterm Elections
The midterms will be a crucial test for mail-in voting. Here's a comparison of mail-in voting policies before and after Trump's executive order:

| Aspect | Before EO | After EO (Attempted) |
|---|---|---|
| Federal Role | Minimal | Increased DHS and SSA involvement |
| Postal Service Delivery | All mailed ballots delivered | Restricted based on eligibility list |
| State Authority | Primary | Undermined by federal overreach |
Key takeaways for voters:
- Mail-in voting remains legal and essential for many Americans.
- The Supreme Court blocked Trump's most restrictive measures, but challenges persist.
- State election officials are working to ensure access, but uncertainty remains.
- Voters should request ballots early and monitor updates from local election offices.
What This Means for Voters
For voters, the message is clear: stay informed and vigilant. While the Supreme Court has temporarily halted the most aggressive parts of Trump's order, the administration may attempt other tactics. Voters should verify their registration, request mail-in ballots as early as possible, and consider alternative voting methods if available.
FAQ
Is mail-in voting still allowed for the midterms?
Is mail-in voting still allowed for the midterms?
Yes, mail-in voting remains legal in most states, and the Supreme Court blocked Trump's attempt to restrict it. However, some states may have changed rules, so check with your local election office.
How did the Supreme Court rule on Trump's mail-in voting order?
How did the Supreme Court rule on Trump's mail-in voting order?
The Supreme Court rejected Trump's plan, ruling that the federal government cannot unilaterally restrict mail-in voting. The decision was a rebuke to the administration's overreach.
What should voters do to ensure their mail-in ballot counts?
What should voters do to ensure their mail-in ballot counts?
Voters should request their ballot early, follow all instructions carefully, and return it well before the deadline. Track your ballot if your state offers that service, and contact your election office if you have concerns.