The UK's approach to China is "beset by incoherence" and plagued by a lack of senior expertise, according to a new report that warns of the risks inherent in misjudging the bilateral relationship. The audit, conducted by the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac), highlights that past engagement with Beijing has often exposed the UK to interference risks without delivering promised opportunities.
Report Highlights Incoherent UK China Policy
The Ipac audit, released on Wednesday, states that successful UK engagement with China must be framed by an understanding that the People's Republic of China is an "inherently hostile authoritarian state that does not share our values." The report underscores that the inherent power imbalance with the world's second-largest economy is further compounded by muddled policy and weak engagement.
One striking example cited is a visiting Chinese delegation's observation that no senior government official engaging with Beijing was a Mandarin speaker or had significant experience living in China. Although British expertise exists, it is often siloed and "not translated into capability," according to Ipac, which includes members from all major UK parties.
Key Takeaways from the Ipac Audit
- Incoherent policy: The UK's China strategy lacks a clear framework, leading to inconsistent engagement.
- Expertise gap: Senior officials often lack language skills and firsthand experience in China.
- Underutilized knowledge: Existing China expertise is fragmented and not effectively leveraged.
- Risk of interference: Past engagement has exposed the UK to interference without commensurate benefits.
- Bipartisan concern: The report has support from across the political spectrum, including former security minister Tom Tugendhat.
Expertise Gap in UK China Relations
The lack of senior expertise is a critical vulnerability. Without Mandarin-speaking officials or those with deep experience in China, the UK risks misinterpreting Beijing's intentions and failing to protect its interests. The report suggests that this gap leads to reactive rather than strategic policymaking.
Tom Tugendhat, former security minister, endorsed the report as "a clear-eyed and realistic take on the defining foreign policy problem of this century." His support underscores the bipartisan recognition of the issue.
Comparison of UK and Other Approaches to China
| Country | China Strategy | Expertise Level | Key Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| UK | Incoherent, lacking clear framework | Low at senior levels | Mixed engagement and caution |
| US | Strategic competition | High, with dedicated China experts | Technology, security, human rights |
| Germany | Balanced, with emphasis on trade | Moderate, growing | Economic ties, human rights |
| Australia | Firm, with focus on sovereignty | High, with regional expertise | Indo-Pacific security, trade |
Implications for UK Foreign Policy
The report's findings have significant implications for UK foreign policy. As China's global influence grows, the UK must develop a coherent strategy that balances engagement with vigilance. This requires investing in expertise, fostering a cadre of China-savvy officials, and ensuring that policy is informed by a clear understanding of Beijing's authoritarian nature.
Moreover, the UK should leverage its existing expertise by breaking down silos and integrating knowledge across government departments. This would enable more effective decision-making and reduce the risk of interference.
FAQ
What is the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac)?
Ipac is an international grouping of China-sceptic legislators from various countries, including the UK. It aims to coordinate responses to China's growing global influence and promote human rights and democratic values.
Why does the UK lack China expertise?
The UK's expertise is often siloed in academia and think tanks, and not effectively translated into government capability. Additionally, there is a shortage of senior officials with Mandarin language skills or significant experience living in China.
What are the risks of an incoherent China policy?
An incoherent policy can lead to misjudgments, missed opportunities, and increased vulnerability to Chinese interference. It also undermines the UK's ability to negotiate effectively and protect its national interests.