Children need human interaction, not AI, to thrive in education and life. As a father of three and a researcher studying artificial intelligence's impact, Daniel Susskind recently argued that AI can fill gaps in education. But his claim that 'human tutors are too expensive to provide to everyone' misses the point: too expensive relative to what? If we redirected the wealth amassed by tech billionaires, we could provide quality human tutors for all children—no AI needed.
The True Cost of Replacing Teachers with AI
The push for AI in classrooms is not about improving education—it is about cutting costs and enriching a few. AI tutors may mimic stories and podcasts, but they cannot offer the genuine connection, empathy, and adaptability of a human teacher. Students protesting against AI understand this: its imposition serves only to worsen labour conditions and deepen inequality.
What AI Cannot Provide
- Emotional support: AI cannot comfort a frustrated child or celebrate their breakthroughs.
- Critical thinking: AI rehashes old ideas; human teachers inspire new ones.
- Social skills: Interaction with peers and adults is essential for development.
- Equity: AI-driven education often benefits the wealthy while cutting resources for the many.
AI vs. Human Tutors: A Comparison
Let's compare the two approaches across key educational factors.
| Factor | AI Tutor | Human Tutor |
|---|---|---|
| Cost | Low upfront, but hidden societal costs | Higher upfront, but equitable if funded publicly |
| Personalization | Algorithmic, based on data | Empathetic, based on relationship |
| Emotional Support | None | Strong |
| Creativity | Rehashes existing content | Inspires new ideas |
| Social Development | Isolating | Collaborative |
The Environmental and Social Costs of AI in Education
AI requires massive data centres and resource-intensive automation—environmentally catastrophic and unsustainable. Moreover, it replaces human connection with narcissistic customization. While social media at least offered some connection, AI fundamentally does not. Children need real interaction to develop empathy, resilience, and creativity.
Why Human Interaction Matters
Research consistently shows that human interaction is critical for cognitive and social development. Children learn best through play, conversation, and mentorship. AI may offer convenience, but it cannot replicate the nuanced feedback and emotional bonds that shape young minds.
FAQ
Is AI in education always harmful?
Not always, but it should supplement—not replace—human teachers. AI can assist with administrative tasks, but children need human interaction for holistic development.
How can we afford human tutors for all?
By taxing the ultra-wealthy and reallocating funds from tech subsidies to public education. It's a matter of political will, not scarcity.
What do students say about AI in schools?
Many students protest AI because they see it as a tool to cut costs and worsen labour conditions, not to improve learning. They demand human-centered education.
In conclusion, children need human interaction, not AI. Let's invest in teachers, not tech lords, for a future where every child thrives.
Best Products We’ve Tested and Rated

Our testing team has hands-on reviews of starter rod, saltwater lures, rain suit, fly waders, and lures walleye. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.
Our testing team has hands-on reviews of line trout, line bass, backpack rod holders, fish fillet knife, and bass rod. Every option below was compared across price, build quality, and real-world performance, with honest pros and cons. We update these guides regularly as new models arrive, so the recommendations stay current.