Police Drop Action Over Polanski Farage Guillotine Image 2026

The Metropolitan Police have decided to take no further action against Green Party leader Zack Polanski after he shared a controversial image of a guillotine with the phrase “we’re only making plans for Nigel” on Instagram. The decision comes amid rising concerns over threats toward politicians and has sparked debate about the boundaries of online political expression.

Background of the Incident

Polanski, who leads the Green Party in England and Wales, admitted to making an “inadvertent mistake” when he shared the image, which was part of a collaborative Instagram post. The fifth photo in a set of 20 showed a man wearing a T-shirt with the guillotine graphic, a clear reference to Nigel Farage, the former UKIP and Brexit Party leader. Polanski quickly removed the image after realizing its content, but not before Reform UK reported him to the police, accusing him of “inciting murder.”

During an interview on BBC’s Newsnight, Polanski explained that he had accepted a collaboration request from a photographer, not fully reviewing all images before sharing. He stated, “As soon as I was aware of what happened, I unaccepted it and took it down.” Despite the backlash, Polanski repeatedly refused to apologize to Farage, arguing that since the share was unintentional, an apology would be inappropriate. Instead, he condemned political violence and committed to being more careful on social media in the future.

Police Decision and Rationale

The Met Police conducted a thorough review of the incident and concluded that the threshold for criminal action was not met. In a statement, a spokesperson said, “We absolutely understand the reaction to this image being shared online, particularly in the context of increasing threats toward politicians. While there will be people who will argue that those who shared the image in this Instagram post should be subject to criminal action, our review has concluded that on this occasion, the threshold is not met.”

However, the police did note that wearing the T-shirt itself should be recorded as a crime and referred a crime report to Avon and Somerset Police, which covers Bristol, where the photograph was likely taken. This distinction highlights the legal difference between sharing an image and actively wearing or promoting such imagery in a public space.

Comparison of Legal Outcomes

Reactions from Political Figures

Nigel Farage called for Polanski’s arrest, while Zia Yusuf, Reform UK’s home affairs spokesperson, accused him of “inciting murder.” The Greens defended Polanski, stating the T-shirt was “clearly in poor taste” but emphasizing that the share was accidental. This incident underscores the heightened sensitivity around political violence and the role of social media in amplifying threats.

Key Takeaways

• Police decided no criminal action against Polanski for sharing the image.
• Wearing the T-shirt itself is treated as a crime, with a report sent to Avon and Somerset Police.
• Polanski refused to apologize, citing the unintentional nature of the share.
• The case highlights the legal line between sharing and creating threatening content.
• Political leaders face increased scrutiny over online behavior.

FAQ