Colorado's Hartman town was declared abandoned after a drinking water crisis and complete leadership resignations, highlighting the critical importance of municipal governance and infrastructure maintenance. The small community of fewer than 60 residents lost its entire board of trustees and town clerk, leaving no one to manage water treatment or delivery. This unprecedented administrative failure serves as a stark warning for rural towns across America.
What Led to Hartman's Abandonment?
Hartman, established in 1910, faced years of political infighting, accusations of fraud, and even a physical fight at a governing board meeting. The town's water tower required substantial repairs but was neglected as feuds prevented any qualified water operator from stepping in. According to the Denver Post, the conflict resembled the infamous Hatfield-McCoy rivalry, paralyzing all municipal functions.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Resident Jessie Simmons alerted the secretary of state that the water lacked chlorine for over a month, smelled horrible, and had been under a boil-water order for months. With no board or clerk, the town could not hold elections or maintain essential services, triggering Colorado's law for dissolving incorporated communities.
Key Factors in the Crisis
- Leadership vacuum: All public leaders resigned, leaving no governance structure.
- Infrastructure neglect: The water tower needed repairs for years but was never fixed.
- Water contamination: Untreated water posed severe health risks to residents.
- Inability to act: Feuding prevented hiring water operators or addressing emergencies.
Comparison: Hartman vs. Functional Small Towns
| Factor | Hartman (Abandoned) | Functional Small Town |
|---|---|---|
| Leadership | Resigned, no board | Active trustees and clerk |
| Water system | Unsafe, boil-water order | Regular testing and chlorination |
| Infrastructure upkeep | Neglected for years | Routine maintenance and funding |
| Community engagement | Feuding and distrust | Collaborative decision-making |
Implications for Local Governance
This case underscores how small-town governance can collapse without conflict resolution mechanisms and external oversight. The state's intervention, transferring responsibilities to Prowers County, prevents a complete service breakdown but raises questions about rural sustainability.
Experts suggest that proactive state audits and support for water infrastructure funding could mitigate such crises. The water crisis in Hartman was not sudden but a slow decay from neglect and dysfunction.

Lessons for Other Communities
Rural towns must prioritize transparent leadership and infrastructure investment. Regular water quality testing, maintenance schedules, and community mediation can prevent similar failures. The Hartman case is a cautionary tale for the importance of municipal resilience.