Led By Donkeys has received £27,216 in compensation after a giant banner reading “Yes It’s A Genocide” was seized and destroyed by Greater London Authority (GLA) officials and the environmental services company Veolia. The banner, measuring 40 metres by 40 metres, was unfurled in Parliament Square on 4 December 2024 to protest Israel’s military campaign in Gaza. The compensation settlement marks a significant victory for the campaign group and raises questions about the treatment of Palestine-related protests in Britain.
The Seizure and Legal Battle
According to Led By Donkeys, GLA representatives confiscated the banner shortly after it was displayed. The group spent 19 months trying to retrieve it, only to be told it had been handed to Veolia, which destroyed it. Following legal letters demanding either the GLA or Veolia cover the banner’s cost, Veolia agreed to pay £27,216. Ben Stewart, co-founder of Led By Donkeys, stated: “Pursuing compensation was never about the money, it was about defending space to protest Israel’s war crimes.”
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Comparison of Protest Incidents
| Incident | Outcome | Compensation |
|---|---|---|
| Led By Donkeys Gaza banner seizure | Banner destroyed by Veolia | £27,216 |
| Extinction Rebellion banner removal (2020) | Returned after legal challenge | None |
| Stop HS2 protest camp eviction (2023) | Equipment destroyed, no compensation | £0 |
Key Takeaways
- Led By Donkeys won £27,216 compensation after their Gaza protest banner was seized and destroyed.
- The GLA initially refused to return the banner, later claiming it had been given to Veolia for disposal.
- Legal letters forced Veolia to pay for the banner, which cost £27,216 to produce and deploy.
- The case highlights unequal treatment of Palestine protests compared to other activism in the UK.
- A video of the banner featuring Holocaust historian Prof Amos Goldberg went viral, calling the situation “exactly what a genocide looks like.”
Broader Implications for Protest Rights
Ben Stewart emphasised that “Palestine protests are treated differently in Britain to all other forms of activism. Direct action is regarded as terrorism and words on a placard are rendered illegal.” The group has conducted numerous stunts—billboards, projections, banners—across the country, but this was the first time their equipment was seized and destroyed when the message related to Palestine.
The banner’s message drew on the findings of the UN independent international commission of inquiry, which in September last year concluded that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza. The compensation settlement does not change the legal status of the protest, but it does set a precedent for holding authorities accountable for unlawful confiscation.
FAQ
Why did Veolia pay compensation?
Veolia paid £27,216 after legal letters were sent by Led By Donkeys demanding either the GLA or Veolia cover the cost of the banner, which had been seized by GLA officials and then destroyed by Veolia. The company agreed to settle rather than face further legal action.
Was the banner considered illegal?
The banner itself was not declared illegal; the GLA seized it on the grounds that it was a “large structure” requiring permission. Led By Donkeys argued that the seizure was a violation of protest rights. The compensation settlement does not acknowledge wrongdoing but confirms the property was destroyed without proper process.
What does this mean for future protests?
The case sets a financial incentive for authorities to respect protest property. It may encourage campaign groups to pursue compensation when equipment is unlawfully seized. However, it does not change the legal landscape for Palestine protests, which Led By Donkeys claims face harsher treatment than other movements.
The compensation victory comes as the conflict in Gaza continues, with over 40,000 people killed since October 2023. Led By Donkeys says it will use the funds to support further activism. For now, the group has proven that even when banners are destroyed, the right to protest—and the cost of violating it—must be taken seriously.