Child pedestrian casualties are almost five times higher in England's most deprived areas compared to the wealthiest, according to new Department for Transport (DfT) analysis. The widening gap over the past decade highlights a stark inequality in road safety, with over 20% of child pedestrian deaths or injuries occurring in the poorest 10% of postcodes versus just 4% in the richest.
This official data underscores a troubling trend: while overall road fatalities fell by 4% to 1,538 in 2025, serious injuries rose to 29,918, and the burden falls disproportionately on vulnerable children in low-income communities. The report, which examines deprivation and road casualties in England, reveals strong links between poverty and risk for pedestrians and bus users, with car occupants showing a different pattern due to higher mileage in affluent areas.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Key Findings from the DfT Deprivation Report
The DfT's analysis of serious accidents in England shows that the proportion of child pedestrian casualties from the most deprived decile is more than five times that of the least deprived. This disparity has widened over the past decade, raising concerns among safety campaigners.
Widening Inequality in Road Safety
Rebecca Guy of the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents stated: "It is particularly concerning that the gap between the most and least deprived areas has widened over the last decade. If the government is serious about reducing road deaths and serious injuries, tackling inequality must be at the heart of its approach." The data suggests that investment and prevention efforts must target the communities at greatest risk.
Motorcycle Fatalities Rise

While car driver deaths declined, motorcycle fatalities increased by 14%—from 325 in 2024 to 372 in 2025. This counter-trend demands a specific policy response, as motorcyclists remain a high-risk group on British roads.
Comparison of Casualty Rates by Deprivation Decile
| Deprivation Decile | Child Pedestrian Casualties (%) | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|
| Most Deprived (10%) | 20%+ | High |
| Least Deprived (10%) | 4% | Low |
| Middle Deciles | Varies | Moderate |
This table illustrates the stark disparity. The data also shows that for car occupants, mileage is higher in wealthier postcodes, but the risk per mile is higher for deprived drivers, suggesting that exposure alone doesn't explain the inequality.
Key Takeaways for Policy and Community Action
- Targeted investment in road safety measures in deprived areas is critical to reduce child pedestrian casualties.
- Speed reduction zones and safer crossing points near schools in low-income neighborhoods can save lives.
- Addressing social determinants like traffic volume and inadequate infrastructure is essential to close the gap.
- Motorcycle safety campaigns need urgent attention given the rising fatality trend.
FAQ
Why are child pedestrian casualties higher in deprived areas?
What does the DfT report measure?
How can the government reduce road inequality?
In conclusion, the DfT figures reveal a pressing social justice issue. Without deliberate policy shifts, the gap in child pedestrian casualties will continue to widen, leaving the most vulnerable children at disproportionate risk. Road safety must be viewed through an equity lens.