The Metropolitan Police have decided not to pursue criminal charges against Green Party leader Zack Polanski after he shared an Instagram post featuring a man wearing a T-shirt with a guillotine and the phrase “we’re only making plans for Nigel” – a clear reference to Nigel Farage. Polanski, who called the incident an “inadvertent mistake,” will not apologize to Farage, and the police review concluded the sharing did not meet the criminal threshold.
Background of the Controversial Image
The image in question was part of a set of 20 photos Polanski accepted as a collaboration on Instagram. The fifth photo showed a T-shirt depicting a guillotine, a symbol historically associated with execution, alongside a lyric from the XTC song “Making Plans for Nigel,” which targets Farage by name. The Green Party later removed the post and described the T-shirt as “clearly in poor taste.”
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Polanski’s Response and Refusal to Apologize
During an interview on BBC’s Newsnight, Polanski stated, “If I’d done it deliberately, I’d be apologising. But because this was a mistake, the important thing is that I point out it’s a mistake, that I also make sure that I condemn political violence.” He repeatedly ruled out issuing an apology to Farage, emphasizing his commitment to better managing his social media presence.
Police Investigation and Legal Threshold
Reform UK, the party led by Nigel Farage, had reported Polanski to the Metropolitan Police for allegedly “inciting murder.” Zia Yusuf, the party’s home affairs spokesperson, and Farage himself called for Polanski’s arrest. However, after conducting inquiries, the Met concluded that sharing the image online was unlikely to constitute a criminal offense. A spokesperson explained, “While there will be people who will argue that those who shared the image should be subject to criminal action, our review has concluded that on this occasion, the threshold is not met.”
Police Referral to Avon and Somerset Police
Although no action will be taken against Polanski, the Met noted that the wearing of the T-shirt itself should be recorded as a crime. They have referred a crime report to Avon and Somerset Police, which covers Bristol, where the incident likely occurred. This distinction highlights the difference between sharing an image and the original act of wearing it.
Comparison of Police Actions in Similar Cases
| Case | Outcome | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Polanski sharing guillotine image | No further action | Sharing did not meet criminal threshold |
| Wearing the T-shirt (original incident) | Referral to local police | Potential crime – under investigation |
| Historical threats against politicians | Often prosecuted | Direct threats or incitement |
Key Takeaways
- No criminal charges were filed against Polanski for sharing the guillotine image.
- Polanski maintains it was an accidental share and will not apologize to Farage.
- The Met police emphasized the increasing threats toward politicians as context for public concern.
- The original wearer of the T-shirt is being investigated by Avon and Somerset Police.
- Reform UK’s complaint was not sufficient to meet the legal threshold for prosecution.
FAQ
Why did the police take no action against Zack Polanski?
The Metropolitan Police concluded that sharing the image online did not meet the legal threshold for a criminal offense. While the context of threats against politicians was acknowledged, the act of sharing was not deemed to constitute incitement or harassment.
Will Polanski apologize to Nigel Farage?
No. Polanski stated that because the share was a mistake, he would not apologize. He instead condemned political violence and promised to be more careful on social media.
What was the image that Polanski shared?
The image was the fifth in a set of 20 photos from an Instagram collaboration. It showed a man wearing a T-shirt with a guillotine and the phrase “we’re only making plans for Nigel,” referencing Nigel Farage.
Is the person who wore the T-shirt being investigated?
Yes. The Metropolitan Police recorded the wearing of the T-shirt as a crime and referred it to Avon and Somerset Police for investigation.
This case underscores the delicate balance between free expression and the need to protect public figures from incitement. As police focus on the original act rather than the digital share, the debate over accountability on social media continues.