D4vd blood evidence emerged in court this week as prosecutors detailed how stains on objects in the singer’s home likely came from 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez. The preliminary hearing could determine whether David Anthony Burke, known as D4vd, stands trial for first-degree murder.
Prosecution’s Forensic Findings
LAPD criminalist Samantha Tosch testified that blood samples from a rowing machine, rubber floor mat, and Tesla charger were “one septillion times more likely” to match the victim than anyone else. The evidence links Burke to the decomposed body found in his Tesla last fall.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Defense Challenges Chain of Custody
Defense attorney Blair Berk questioned why chainsaws and other items in the garage were not tested. She suggested multiple residents at the Hollywood Hills address could have left DNA. Criminalist Lauren Wallace acknowledged that “multiple people lived at this residence.”
Key Evidence Compared
| Items Tested | Items Not Tested |
|---|---|
| Rowing machine | Chainsaws |
| Rubber floor mat | Other tools in garage |
| Tesla charger | Personal electronics |
Prosecutors allege Burke killed Rivas Hernandez to prevent her from exposing their sexual relationship as his music career rose. He has pleaded not guilty to charges including lewd acts with a minor and mutilation of remains.
Key Takeaways
- Blood evidence strongly ties Burke to the victim according to LAPD criminalists.
- Defense highlights gaps in forensic testing, especially on chainsaws.
- The preliminary hearing will decide if probable cause exists for a trial.
- Burke’s legal team plans to question the reliability of DNA sampling.
FAQ
What is the D4vd murder case about?
Singer D4vd (David Anthony Burke) is accused of murdering 14-year-old Celeste Rivas Hernandez and mutilating her remains. The case is in a preliminary hearing to determine if there is enough evidence for a trial.
What blood evidence was presented?
LAPD criminalists testified that blood stains on a rowing machine, rubber floor mat, and Tesla charger in Burke’s garage are statistically nearly certain to belong to the victim.
What is the defense arguing?
The defense notes that multiple people lived in the residence, and that law enforcement did not test several items like chainsaws. They challenge the thoroughness of the investigation.
As the hearing continues, both sides prepare for a potential trial. The outcome will hinge on forensic evidence and the credibility of witness testimony.