The George Michael and Lindsay Anderson conflict is one of the most intriguing behind-the-scenes stories in music documentary history. As the producer who hired Anderson to direct the theatrical documentary of Wham!'s historic China trip, I witnessed firsthand the creative clash that led to Anderson's dismissal and the near-suppression of his work.
The Fateful Meeting in Hong Kong
On April 3, 1985, in a Hong Kong hotel, Lindsay Anderson called a crew meeting ahead of our flight to Beijing. His pep talk, delivered in his signature stentorian style, referenced Henry V's St Crispin's Day oration. He called George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley 'Apostles of the New Materialism,' blending shrewd observation with sardonic wit.
Get the #1 Wireless Door Camera
REOLINK Bestseller: 2K Weatherproof Video Doorbell, No Monthly Fees.
Anderson's vision was to capture China on the verge of modernization, a stark contrast to the pop-star travelogue the Wham! camp expected. This fundamental difference in perspective set the stage for the conflict that would erupt six months later.
The Dismissal and the 'Un-Film'
After the first cut of If You Were There... was screened for George Michael and Andrew Ridgeley, Anderson was abruptly dismissed. The 80-minute work-in-progress was denounced, and his insightful film became an 'un-film,' only surfacing in a BFI centennial screening.
The media storm in the mid-80s quickly faded, replaced by a frothy one-hour reel titled Foreign Skies, confected by music video operators and premiered at Wham! The Final in 1986. When I told Anderson of this bowdlerised derivative, he responded with a withering 'Quite!'

Wham! 10 Days in China: A New Perspective
Now, the George Michael estate has sanctioned Wham! 10 Days in China, a new film that draws on the vast archive of unseen footage shot by Anderson and our team. This documentary promises to finally present the story with the depth and nuance it deserves.
Key Differences Between the Two Films
| Aspect | If You Were There... (Anderson) | Wham! 10 Days in China (New) |
|---|---|---|
| Director | Lindsay Anderson | Chris Smith |
| Runtime | 80 minutes (work-in-progress) | ~90 minutes |
| Focus | China's modernization | Wham!'s journey and cultural impact |
| Archive footage | Original, uncut | Restored and re-edited |
| Estate approval | No | Yes |
Why This Story Matters
The clash between George Michael and Lindsay Anderson highlights the tension between artistic vision and commercial expectations in documentary filmmaking. Anderson's dismissal was a loss for cinema, but the new film offers a chance to reassess his contribution.
Key Takeaways
- Anderson's film was a serious cultural document, not just a pop promo.
- The new documentary restores Anderson's footage to its rightful place.
- Understanding this history enriches appreciation of Wham!'s legacy.
- The 'un-film' status of Anderson's work is finally being reversed.
FAQ
Why was Lindsay Anderson fired from the Wham! China film?
What happened to Anderson's original film?
Is the new Wham! documentary worth watching?
The story of George Michael and Lindsay Anderson is a cautionary tale about the perils of creative collaboration. Yet it also shows how time can heal old wounds, allowing the true artistry to shine through.